Film Review: A Family Affair 全家福 (1984) - Hong Kong
Reviewed by Andrew Chan (Film Critics Circle of Australia)
I rated it 7.5/10
Rating: ★ ★ ★ 1/2
Support my reviews by buying me a Coffee! https://buymeacoffee.com/neofilmblog
Support our reviews by buying from official DVDs / Blu Rays at NeoFilmShop.com
A Family Affair earns solid marks for the way it lets two children carry a marriage that the adults have already given up on. Dean Shek’s 1984 Cinema City comedy-drama is not a farce about divorce. It is a domestic picture that happens to have a clown for a grandfather, and the distinction matters.
Chan Wing-cheung (Sam Hui) and Nancy (Olivia Cheng) have already split when the film begins, one child apiece, the usual Hong Kong arrangement of separate flats and shared resentment. Each has found someone new: Melvin Wong’s George on one side, Jenny Tseng’s Linda, in a special appearance, on the other. The children, ten-year-old Maisy (Helen Chan) and seven-year-old Tommy (Siu Ban-ban), do not accept the new order. Neither does Nancy’s father, Alex (Shek), who would rather scheme than watch his grandchildren acquire step-parents. What follows is a campaign of small sabotage. It fails. The couple files. The children run.
George and Linda are not monsters. They are simply the people who arrived after the marriage had already stopped working, and the film is decent enough not to punish them for it. That decency is the picture’s best idea. Divorce, in 1984 Hong Kong commercial cinema, was usually a pretext for shouting or for a miracle in the last reel. Shek and screenwriter Lee Chun keep the shouting, but they also keep the ordinary reasons people leave: temperament, pride, the fatigue of being known too well. Hui, who could have coasted on charm, plays Wing-cheung as a man who is likable and still wrong. Cheng matches him. Their scenes together have the rhythm of an argument that has been rehearsed for years.
The film’s real lead, though, is Siu Ban-ban. Child actors in this sort of story are usually asked to be cute on cue and then cry on cue. Tommy does both, but he also watches. There is a quality in his face, when the adults are performing reconciliation for his benefit, that suggests he already knows the performance. Helen Chan’s Maisy is the older strategist, less tearful, more exacting. Together they steal the picture from a cast that includes one of the era’s biggest singers and one of Cinema City’s founding clowns, which is not a small theft. The Archive revival notes were not being sentimental. The children are why the film still plays.
Shek is the problem and the pleasure. As Alex he is funny in the old way: talismans, boasts, a mediation plan that deepens the mess it was meant to fix. Some of that is in character. A grandfather who cannot sit still with grief will turn grief into a bit. Some of it is the house style. Cinema City liked a joke even when the scene had already found its feeling, and A Family Affair sometimes reaches for the joke a beat too early. The last movement, with the children gone to a temple to pray, asks us to believe that love is invincible. The theme song, Hui and Tseng’s 無敵是愛, insists on the same thing, and it was a Top 10 Gold Song for a reason: it is sincere, and it is also a sales pitch. The ending earns its tears more honestly than the song earns its title. Love, in this film, is not invincible. It is merely still available, if the adults will stop defending themselves long enough to hear two small voices in a temple.
At the 1984 box office the film took HK$22.1 million and finished fourth for the year, a nose ahead of Wheels on Meals. That figure is not a critical argument, but it is a clue. Audiences were not only buying Sam Hui. They were buying a story about a family that had already come apart and might, with embarrassment, come partly back together. Forty years on, the embarrassment is what holds. The scheme is mechanical. The slapstick is uneven. The reconciliation is more hopeful than the characters have strictly deserved. And yet the two children are so specifically themselves, and the parents so plausibly tired, that the hope does not feel like a cheat. It feels like a concession the film has talked itself into, which is how a lot of families actually decide to try again. (Neo, 2026)